Messy brand architecture is a leadership issue

The notion that brand architecture systems are neatly organised into categories like ‘Branded House’, ‘Subbranded’, ‘Endorsed Brands’ and ‘House of Brands’ is a myth (not to mention an epic misunderstanding of the Brand Relationship Spectrum). Most brand architecture systems are hybrid. And most brand architecture systems are messy. The simple explanation is that humans have […]

Read more

The Distinctive Brand Assets Fallacy

‘Distinctive Brand Asset’ is a grandiose label for colours, phrases, characters, sounds, shapes, images and graphic devices that perform well in a very specific test of memory. ‘Individually Memorable Brand Asset’ would be a more honest term, but who would want to invest millions in building an asset purely because it performs well in a memory test?

Read more

Byron Sharp, brand purpose and the tyranny of the majority

In reducing the role of branding to a single aim – growth – Byron Sharp and the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute have simultaneously established the biggest strength and the greatest weakness of their ‘scientific’ approach: the single-minded pursuit of growth might be an appealing message for CMOs grasping for ‘scientific’ credibility; but it also absolves them of responsibility for important activities that should be a part of their job description, such as ensuring their businesses anticipate and respond to important changes in society, including the continuing struggles against systemic racism, climate change and social inequality.

Read more